Meta-analysis of 2.1 million pregnancies finds no detectable GLP-1 harm signal
Authors writing in Med stress the pooled observational data cannot establish safety, citing heterogeneity, residual confounding and few datasets per outcome.
MH
By Maren Holt · Senior Reporter, GLP-1
Sep 28 20:00 ETSource: Med (New York, N.Y.)
The wire
- 01Ten observational studies covering 2,118,215 women, 8,325 of them exposed to GLP-1 receptor agonists within six months before a positive pregnancy test, showed no clearly detectable rise in miscarriage, congenital anomalies, preterm birth, hypertensive disorders or abnormal fetal growth.
- 02Clinicians fielding questions from patients who conceived while on semaglutide or tirzepatide now have pooled numbers rather than single-cohort reports to frame counselling.
- 03A lower pooled estimate for preeclampsia (OR 0.87, 95% CI 0.78-0.98) rested on only two datasets, and the exposure-window sensitivity analysis reused the same four studies as the primary malformation analysis, so it was not independent.
From the source
Read at pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.govGLP-1 receptor agonist exposure in the periconceptional period and adverse obstetric outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Med (New York, N.Y.) · 2026 Sep 29 · D'Antonio F, Flacco ME, Manzoli L et al.
Source URL https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42810337/
