UC Berkeley letter calls synthetic peptide wellness use unproven amid FDA reclassification
The newsletter notes RFK Jr. directed FDA to move several peptides from Category 2 to Category 1, opening the door to compounding.
DO
By Daniel Okafor · Regulatory Correspondent
Oct 2 07:57 ETSource: PostIndependent.com
The wire
- 01A Wellness Letter from the UC Berkeley School of Public Health, summarized in a physician column, says synthetic peptides sold by influencers lack human evidence of safety or effectiveness.
- 02The column tracks the regulatory shift: 2023 Category 2 placement blocked compounding, and in April the health secretary directed FDA to move peptides to Category 1.
- 03It reports a July Pharmacy Compounding Advisory Committee vote favoring six peptides for conditions including ulcerative colitis, insomnia and wound healing, and flags angiogenesis and contamination concerns.
From the source
Read at postindependent.comDoctor’s Tip: The peptide craze, an unproven wellness fad
You hear a lot these days about protein and peptides. A previous column addressed protein; today’s is about peptides, based on an article in the current Wellness Letter, published monthly by the UC Berkeley School of Public Health. The first sentence is: “This unproven wellness fad could soon be easier to access, but availability doesn’t equal safety or effectiveness.”
